seed seed shop Cannabis
afghani peshawar weed
Maijuana Seeds Canada Paypal paypal canada seeds Salemink, 1
plants-jack-flash-bloom
” - retro13" "“For the other side of the coin, I've grown Super Skunk (Sensi '95) and it performed very well (especially since the price was like 60 guilders or so). It would make a great commercial weed-- very resinous, nice fat buds, though not the densest. Good deep smell, I don't like it but many people do. The high is strong and covers both sides... it will put you Cheapautoflower to sleep if you smoke too much. I would say the Silver Pearl would probably be better if the weed is just for you, or the SSkunk if it is more commercial.” – Shabang" """This plant has the power of NL (after 2.5 weeks flowering the buds are so resinous they stick together), the ease of growth of skunk (never goes hermy), and the delicate class of the sativa early pearl. This Cheapautoflower has to be one of my favorite smokes- the smoke is sweet, orangy-incense, and the high is a full-on trippy head rush."" -retro13" "“We didn’t grow out enough SP to make a decision on variability, but this I can say: its growth characteristics are looser than NL, with slightly lower yield. Its taste is thick, warm, sweet- sort of like incense and toffee. Its very vigorous. The high is not bad. At first, it can be quite shocking (giving a 'hangover' after a night on it), but after you get used to 2012 PayPal seedbanks it, the 'power' hit lasts about an hour, is slightly sativa, but is characterized by the sativa/indica cross type high. Its not couch lock, nor is it get up and go speedy. As far as variability is concerned, I've worked a bit with early pearl (one of the parents), and have decided that this strain is much more variable than I previously assumed. There are two main phenotypes, and when bred against other things, I've seen quite a few different groupings
seeds cannabis paypal
of characteristics coming through. As far as I'm concerned, SP is likely to be kept, just because it's a regular, normal, easy plant to crop without it being too indica, and without having all the hassles of the harder sativas to crop. It takes cuttings well. If I was you, I'd plant as many seeds as you've got and see what comes out. It can have a very nice growth pattern- early and advanced branching, but looser nodes than NL. The leaves stick out on long stems (an EP trait) which makes manicuring as easy as a walk in the park.” –retro13" "Northern Lights x Silver Pearl: “These dark green buds are completely coated in light crystals, making the buds at first seem a lighter green.The buds are evenly covered in lig
about the person, about his characteristics, his way of life, attitudes, notions of
right and wrong, and so on. Marijuana users are of course, a vast and diverse tribe, but
they are not identical to nonusers. They are more likely to have certain kinds of traits. Or,
to put it a different way, people with certain kinds of traits are more likely to try
marijuana. In a sense, some people are more predisposed to use marijuana. Now, at the
same time, we cannot ignore the role of accident, propinquity, fortuitousness, ecology,
location, and situational features of every description that tell us very little about the
person himself. And, too, at the same time, we need not wallow about in the morass of
personality theories of "ego inadequacy," "compensatory mechanisms," "adolescent
rebellion," "rejection of adult authority," and so on, which obfuscate more than they
clarify.
But it is difficult to deny this fundamental fact: marijuana users are different. They are a
different social animal from the nonuser, and in specific ways. It is probably permissible
to say that the marijuana smoker is less attached to the legal structure than is the nonuser.
He is less authoritarian, less likely to follow the rule for the rule's sake, more likely to see
many laws as being unjust. He is more experimental, more adventurous, more daring, at
least vis-à-vis the law. He is not as concerned about the fact of legality or illegality. He is
more likely to have a code of ethics which, he feels, transcends technical law, claiming
allegiance to a "higher order." We would predict that he would be more likely to break the
law than nonusers. Among my respondents, I asked the broad question, "How do you feel
about having broken the law?" Only five respondents (2.5 percent) said that they were
bothered, that they felt guilty about breaking the law; 6 percent said that they had mixed
feelings about their infractions.-The rest, 91 percent of the sample, said that it didn't
bother them, that they didn't think about it, that they didn't consider it against the law (i.e.,
in their own personal creed), that it was a stupid law and ought to be ignored, etc.[15] The
simple fact of "obeying the law," in and of itself, meant little or nothing, apparently, to
most of them.
Now, many will condemn this point of view; some will applaud it. The psychologically
inclined will see in it the germ of a self-destructive motive. Others will take it as proof
that users are thrill and kicks oriented. Believers in the "letter of the law" will castigate
(10 of 28)4/15/2004 1:08:08 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 9
defenders of Pot Seed Canada Paypal its "spirit" will withhold judgment. Regardless of our feelings concerning the
less strict adherence to the rule of law and authority among marijuana users, the fact
remains, this is likely to predispose them toward a higher crime rate, other things being
equal.
It is entirely possible, then, that marijuana smokers are more criminal than their
about the person, about his characteristics, his way of life, attitudes, notions of
right and wrong, and so on. Marijuana users are of course, a vast and diverse tribe, but
they are not identical to nonusers. They are more likely to have certain kinds of traits. Or,
to put it a different way, people with certain kinds of traits are more likely to try
marijuana. In a sense, some people are more predisposed to use marijuana. Now, at the
same time, we cannot ignore the role of accident, propinquity, fortuitousness, ecology,
location, and situational features of every description that tell us very little about the
person himself. And, too, at the same time, we need not wallow about in the morass of
personality theories of "ego inadequacy," "compensatory mechanisms," "adolescent
rebellion," "rejection of adult authority," and so on, which obfuscate more than they
clarify.
But it is difficult to deny this fundamental fact: marijuana users are different. They are a
different social animal from the nonuser, and in specific ways. It is probably permissible
to say that the marijuana smoker is less attached to the legal structure than is the nonuser.
He is less authoritarian, less likely to follow the rule for the rule's sake, more likely to see
many laws as being unjust. He is more experimental, more adventurous, more daring, at
least vis-à-vis the law. He is not as concerned about the fact of legality or illegality. He is
more likely to have a code of ethics which, he feels, transcends technical law, claiming
allegiance to a "higher order." We would predict that he would be more likely to break the
law than nonusers. Among my respondents, I asked the broad question, "How do you feel
about having broken the law?" Only five respondents (2.5 percent) said that they were
bothered, that they felt guilty about breaking the law; 6 percent said that they had mixed
feelings about their infractions.
-The rest, 91 percent of the sample, said that it didn't
bother them, that they didn't think about it, that they didn't consider it against the law (i.e.,
in their own personal creed), that it was a stupid law and ought to be ignored, etc.15] The
simple fact of "obeying the law," in and of itself, meant little or nothing, apparently, to
most of them.
Now, many will condemn this point of view; some will applaud it. The psychologically
inclined will see in it the germ of a self-destructive motive. Others will take it as proof
that users are thrill and kicks oriented. Believers in the "letter of the law" will castigate
(10 of 28)4/15/2004 1:08:08 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 9
defenders of its "spirit" will withhold judgment. Regardless of our feelings concerning the
less strict adherence to the rule of law and authority among marijuana users, the fact
remains, this is likely to predispose them toward a higher crime rate, other things being
equal.
It is entirely possible, then, that marijuana smokers are more criminal than their
about the person, about his characteristics, his way of life, attitudes, notions of
right and wrong, and so on. Marijuana users are of course, a vast and diverse tribe, but
they are not identical to nonusers. They are more likely to have certain kinds of traits. Or,
to put it a different way, people with certain kinds of traits are more likely to try
marijuana. In a sense, some people are more predisposed to use marijuana. Now, at the
same time, we cannot ignore the role of accident, propinquity, fortuitousness, ecology,
location, and situational features of every description that tell us very little about the
person himself. And, too, at the same time, we need not wallow about in the morass of
personality theories of "ego inadequacy," "compensatory mechanisms," "adolescent
rebellion," "rejection of adult authority," and so on, which obfuscate more than they
clarify.
But it is difficult to deny this fundamental fact: marijuana users are different. They are a
different social animal from the nonuser, and in specific ways. It is probably permissible
to say that the marijuana smoker is less attached to the legal structure than is the nonuser.
He is less authoritarian, less likely to follow the rule for the rule's sake, more likely to see
many laws as being unjust.
He is more experimental, more adventurous, more daring, at
least vis-à-vis the law. He is not as concerned about the fact of legality or illegality. He is
more likely to have a code of ethics which, he feels, transcends technical law, claiming
allegiance to a "higher order." We would predict that he would be more likely to break the
law than nonusers.
Among my respondents, I asked the broad question, "How do you feel
about having broken the law?" Only five respondents (2.5 percent) said that they were
bothered, that they felt guilty about breaking the law; 6 percent said that they had mixed
feelings about their infractions.-The rest, 91 percent of the sample, said that it didn't
bother them, that they didn't think about it, that they didn't consider it against the law (i.e.,
in their own personal creed), that it was a stupid law and ought to be ignored, etc.[15 The
simple fact of "obeying the law," in and of itself, meant little or nothing, apparently, to
most of them.
Now, many will condemn this point of view; some will applaud it. The psychologically
inclined will see in it the germ of a self-destructive motive.
Others will take it as proof
that users are thrill and kicks oriented. Believers in the "letter of the law" will castigate
(10 of 28)4/15/2004 1:08:08 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 9
defenders of its "spirit" will withhold judgment. Regardless of our feelings concerning the
less strict adherence to the rule of law and authority among marijuana users, the fact
remains, this is likely to predispose them toward a higher crime rate, other things being
equal.
It is entirely possible, then, that marijuana smokers are more criminal than their
about the person, about his characteristics, his way of life, attitudes, notions of
right and wrong, and so on. Marijuana users are of course, a vast and diverse tribe, but
they are not identical to nonusers.
They are more likely to have certain kinds of traits. Or,
to put it a different way, people with certain kinds of traits are more likely to try
marijuana. In a sense, some people are more predisposed to use marijuana. Now, at the
same time, we cannot ignore the role of accident, propinquity, fortuitousness, ecology,
location, and situational features of every description that tell us very little about the
person himself. And, too, at the same time, we need not wallow about in the morass of
personality theories of "ego inadequacy," "compensatory mechanisms," "adolescent
rebellion," "rejection of adult authority," and so on, which obfuscate more than they
clarify.
But it is difficult to deny this fundamental fact: marijuana users are different. They are a
different social animal from the nonuser, and in specific ways. It is probably permissible
to say that the marijuana smoker is less attached to the legal structure than is the nonuser.
He is less authoritarian, less likely to follow the rule for the rule's sake, more likely to see
many laws as being unjust. He is more experimental, more adventurous, more daring, at
least vis-à-vis the law. He is not as concerned about the fact of legality or illegality. He is
more likely to have a code of ethics which, he feels, transcends technical law, claiming
allegiance to a "higher order.
" We would predict that he would be more likely to break the
law than nonusers.
Among my respondents, I asked the broad question, "How do you feel
about having broken the law?" Only five respondents (2.5 percent) said that they were
bothered, that they felt guilty about breaking the law; 6 percent said that they had mixed
feelings about their infractions.
-The rest, 91 percent of the sample, said that it didn't
bother them, that they didn't think about it, that they didn't consider it against the law (i.e.,
in their own personal creed), that it was a stupid law and ought to be ignored, etc.15 The
simple fact of "obeying the law," in and of itself, meant little or nothing, apparently, to
most of them.
Now, many will condemn this point of view; some will applaud it. The psychologically
inclined will see in it the germ of a self-destructive motive. Others will take it as proof
that users are thrill and kicks oriented. Believers in the "letter of the law" will castigate
(10 of 28)4/15/2004 1:08:08 AM
The Marijuana Smokers - Chapter 9
defenders of its "spirit" will withhold judgment.
Regardless of our feelings concerning the
less strict adherence to the rule of law and authority among marijuana users, the fact
remains, this is likely to predispose them toward a higher crime rate, other things being
equal.
It is entirely possible, then, that marijuana smokers are more criminal than their
@ 5/21/2012 5:24:53 PM: